by Fronetics | Oct 13, 2015 | Blog, Content Marketing, Marketing, Strategy
Imagine for a moment you’re entering an electronics retailer, ready to purchase a new television. You’ve been thinking about buying a new TV for a while, so you’ve done your homework. You know the difference between LCD and plasma. You’re certain that a 50 inch flat screen would look stellar hanging on the wall in your living room. Today’s the day. As you approach the salesman and begin to tell him the specifics of what you are looking to purchase, he looks at you and says, “Thanks for contacting me. I’ll be in touch within 24 to 48 hours.” It sounds silly, right? But that’s essentially what your company is telling prospects when it fails to respond quickly to online leads.
So how is “quickly” defined? Harvard Business Review (HBR) set out to measure how long on average it took for companies to respond to a web-generated lead. Auditing more than 2,200 businesses, they found an average first response time of 42 hours for businesses that responded to a lead within 30 days. Surprisingly, 23% of companies never responded. 
42 hours sure sounds like a long response time, but is it really? Turns out, it’s worse than you might think.
After reviewing the results of the HBR study, a research team at InsideSales.com examined three years of data across six companies that generate and response to web leads, from over fifteen thousand leads and over one hundred thousand call attempts. They focused on one question for this study: When should companies call web-generated leads for optimal contact and qualification ratios? Of this study a researcher wrote:
“…the odds of making a successful contact with a lead are 100 times greater when a contact attempt occurs within 5 minutes, compared to 30 minutes after the lead was submitted. Similarly, the odds of the lead entering the sales process, or becoming qualified, are 21 times greater when contacted within 5 minutes versus 30 minutes after the lead was submitted.”
Essentially, sales teams aren’t only missing opportunities to contact leads when they wait to respond, they’re also missing opportunities to qualify leads.
So where does the organizational problem lie? It could be that your sales team is hyper-focused on their own sales leads, ignoring signs from online leads that they’re nearing closer to purchase. It’s also possible there’s inherit incongruence in the distribution of online leads to members of your sales team. Could you improve response time if leads were distributed differently? Also culpable could be the frequency with which your sales team checks for new leads. Is your CRM pushing sales lead notifications to your sales team only once per day? Pushing out immediate notifications could positively affect your lead response time. Whatever the reason you identify, it’s important to address and rectify these issues as soon as possible.
With a white paper authored by Google and the Corporate Executive Board reporting that today’s B2B customers are nearly 60% through the sales process before engaging a sales rep, it is unsurprising that a reported 35% to 50% of sales go to the vendor that responds first. Is your sales team’s average response time faster than your competition?
by Fronetics | Oct 7, 2015 | Blog, Marketing, Social Media, Strategy
I wrote previously about the opportunities companies within the logistics and supply chain industries can realize through social listening. I cautioned that to reap the benefits and seize the opportunities afforded by social media, companies need to use the information and intelligence gathered.
Using the information and intelligence gathered is essential. There is; however, another critical element: engagement. Engagement is a differentiator. Without engagement you are a lurker. You don’t want to be a lurker.
What is a lurker?
A lurker is someone who observes, but does not participate. If your company does not engage via established social media accounts, your company is lurking. Stop lurking. To realize the benefits of social media and social listening you need to actively engage with customers and others via social media.
What is active engagement?
How can your company actively engage with customers and other via social media? Here are some ideas:
- Ask questions
- Answer questions
- Provide clarification
- Weigh in on a discussion/topic
- Thank followers for their ideas, suggestions, and feedback
- Highlight when/how you have used customer feedback to make changes to a product or service
- Simply let people know you are listening to their comments and feedback.
Action
The information and intelligence your company can gather via social listening is immense. If you do not use what you have gathered you miss out on opportunities and revenue. The same can be said about social lurking. By not actively engaging via social media your company misses out on opportunities.
Social media can be a strategic tool – if used correctly.
This was originally published on Electronics Purchasing Strategies.
by Fronetics | Oct 6, 2015 | Blog, Marketing, Social Media, Strategy, Supply Chain
Companies within the logistics and supply chain industries have been slower to participate in social media than other industries. The primary reason being because of a lack of understanding of what social media is and the role it can play for business. Unfortunately, companies who do not participate in social media miss out on opportunities – and revenue.
Every day conversations are taking place about your company, your products and services, your industry, and your competitors. These conversations are not just happening over the water cooler, they are happening on social media. These conversations not only provide invaluable (and often strategic) information, they also serve to shape and define your company and your brand. With the advent of social media, the reality is that is the customer who drives your company’s image and brand message. If your company isn’t on social media you miss out.
Social listening
Social listening is the process of monitoring social media to identify and assess what is being said about a company, individual, brand, product, or service. Through social listening your company can not only become an innovation engine, you can also gain market intelligence, and you gain intelligence about how your company, products, and services are being perceived. Knowing this information in real-time is invaluable.
Caterpillar is one company that has embraced social listening. Caterpillar engages in social listening with the objectives of gaining deeper insight into:
- Who is talking about the company;
- What is being said about the company;
- What competitors are doing;
- Key influencers;
- The tone of conversations that are taking place.
Kevin Espinosa, Caterpillar’s eBusiness Loyalty Manager, further discusses the company’s social listening strategy and the benefits of social listening:
“If you haven’t started already, you have to start with social listening. It’s like building a large campus without the sidewalks. Let your audience lay down the paths and sidewalks they want to take. They’ll tell you where they’re participating and what they need. Then you can backfill with a strategy that addresses their needs. This is the push aspect of social media. Eventually, you get to the pull aspect, where the customer is a big contributor to your social media strategy. This is where there is truly two-way dialogue and relationship building.”
Engagement and action
To reap the benefits of social listening, including increasing your revenue, you need to use the information and intelligence gathered. For example, if you learn via social media that your customers are experiencing issues with a specific product, take steps to determine what the issues are, and then make changes to the product. The Aberdeen Group offers additional examples of how social listening has been and can be used: “companies can use the voice of the customer to make critical adjustments and find issues related to inventory allocation, order management, returns management, cost, overall service satisfaction and beyond.”
The opportunities the supply chain and logistics industries can realize through social listening are great. Not participating in social listening results in missed opportunities.
This post originally appeared on Electronics Purchasing Strategies.
by Fronetics | Oct 5, 2015 | Blog, Logistics, Strategy, Supply Chain, Transportation & Trucking
On October 1st the 735-foot cargo ship El Faro issued a distress call, and then vanished in the eye of Hurricane Joaquin. The search for the ship, captain, and crew has thrust the shipping industry into the spotlight.
There is a common misconception that the majority of goods we purchase arrive via plane, or are transported via road. The reality is that 90% of everything we buy comes by ship – and it’s not likely that this number is going to decrease any time soon.
The advent of the megaship
In the last 50 years cargo-carrying capacity has increased by 1,200%. In the past 10 years cargo-carrying capacity has increased by 80%. Today’s bohemyths including the CSCL Globe, MSC Oscar, and MSC Zoe will soon be surpassed by ships that can carry more, and more. In June the major Chinese shipping group Cosco announced that it has ordered nine 20,000-TEU capacity ships, with an option for four additional identical vessels.
Larger ships are about efficiency and about narrowing the cost advantage. Not only do larger ships carry more containers, they also consume as little as 50% of the fuel per container moved as older ships, while also more than halving insurance and staffing costs.
The race for efficiency and cost advantage is competitive. The Globe held the record for largest carrying capacity for just 53 days, and then had to relinquish the title to The Oscar. The Oscar has a capacity of 19,224 TEUs, 124 more TEUs than The Globe.
Congestion
The increase in the size and volume of ships is putting pressure on ports. At least 7 out of the 10 busiest US ports by container volume are grappling with regular congestion. Early this year, congestion crippled West Coast ports grinding activities to a halt. Although operations have resumed, it won’t be smooth sailing going forward. It is projected that congestion will only get worse as ships continue to grow in size and volume. A 2013 Department of Transportation study projects that between 2010 and 2040 the volume of the US’s container trade with Northeast Asia—which accounts for the majority of the US’s overall container trade— will more than triple.
In a recent Wall Street Journal article, Frank Layo, retail strategist at consulting firm Kurt Salmon, points to the economic costs of the congestion. He forecasts that the cumulative costs of shipping delays could reach $7 billion this year and climb as high as $37 billion in 2016. Additionally, he expects some retailers to divert shipments from Asia to more-expensive routes to avoid congested West Coast ports. This could impact consumers in the form of stock-outs and price increases.
Loss
According to a recent survey by the World Shipping Council, an average of 1,679 containers are lost overboard every year. The loss of these containers cause significant economic losses for carriers and their customers, have the potential for harming the environment and marine life, and are a hazard to those on the water (floating containers pose an off-shore danger).
The majority of time ships don’t lose their entire load overboard. Rather, a number of containers are lost. But what happens when an entire load is lost, or even worse, when an entire ship is lost?
AGCS experts believe that the industry should prepare for a loss of $1 billon or more in the future. Captain Rahul Khanna, Global Head of Marine Risk Consulting, AGCS, believes that a $2 billion container ship loss scenario is not out of the realm of possibility.
El Faro is not a megaship. Nonetheless, El Faro and her crew of 33 play a significant role in the global economy. As Hurricane Joaquin moves out of the Bahamas we can hope that El Faro, her captain, crew, and cargo will be found – safe.
by Fronetics | Oct 1, 2015 | Blog, Content Marketing, Marketing, Strategy
Around the time when the leaves start changing color every year, companies turn their focus to year-end revenue and gross profit forecasts. Those forecasts, in turn, are used to inform the establishment of sales and revenue targets for the following year. These goals can inspire your sales team to re-imagine internal processes to drive stellar results. Or, they can have a real demotivating effect on the team and organization.
Follow these four steps to create challenging but achievable goals that will lead you to better results, more consistent targeting, and a team that is motivated for the long run.
Evaluate
Look at the current state of your business and define your desired sales/revenue outcome based on this knowledge. Yes, this is much harder than saying, “my boss says to grow by 30%”, but the deep understanding of you current state will lead your organization stop focusing on the numbers to achieve and start focusing on the process of achievement. This is the hardest and most detailed step.
Segment
Once you have established the current state and desired outcome; break up these revenue/sales numbers and the process to get them into small portions. By doing this, you establish a pattern of smaller wins/process goal attainment. In the end, you will have developed a culture of winning and/or adjustment instead of an “all or nothing” mentality.
Structure
Now, build in a system that rewards superior behavior and discourages falling short. You will still have the over-achievers….they need to feel fairly treated for being better than average. You will have folks who fall short…they need redirection and course correction (maybe even managed out of the business). Remembering that since these are “small chunks” your team never gets too far behind before a correction can occur and your top performers are still treated as stars.
Adjust
Lastly, develop a culture of “adjustment”, both up and down. Most teams are used to a big target at the beginning of the year that never adjusts….you win or you lose….and so does your company. I think we all know the reality is that in the current economic environment, it’s not that simple. Having the ability to adjust as your “knowledge of the current state” becomes definite allows you to throttle up when you can and down when you have to.
One word of caution, if you try this approach you need to commit all the way. A half attempt at this would be disastrous. You need to commit to change in order to change your culture and to get the results that you want. One last thing, if you are now saying to yourself, “that’s all well and good, but my external stakeholders (lenders, principles, shareholders, managers, etc.) aren’t sympathetic to this type of curved lined forecasting”. I get that too. The answer is simple. Once have your current state defined and your desired outcomes articulated, take a conservative approach to this forecast and decide whether it is good enough for your external stakeholders. If it is, you have your worst case scenario that should only be affected by upside surprises. If it’s not, no hoping or praying for you to achieve your goals is going to make it any prettier in the long run. Make the strategic adjustments now and be better off at the end of the year.
