by Jennifer Hart Yim | May 10, 2017 | Blog, Current Events, Logistics, Strategy, Supply Chain
Updated January 16, 2025
Starbucks’ closely managed supply chain may be the key to the premium coffee giant’s success.
Highlights:
- Starbucks attributes much of its success to its vertically integrated supply chain, managing every step from coffee bean sourcing to final cup, allowing for consistent quality control and ethical sourcing practices across its global operations.
- Unlike its competitor Dunkin’ Donuts, which outsources most operations, Starbucks directly manages relationships with 300,000 coffee growers worldwide through its Coffee and Farmer Equity (C.A.F.E.) standards, ensuring both quality standards and ethical practices.
- This supply chain strategy has contributed to Starbucks’ significant market dominance, with the company generating $32.2 billion in revenue in 2023 and operating nearly 37,000 stores globally, far outpacing Dunkin’ Donuts’ presence and revenue.
The Secret is the Supply Chain, According to Starbucks
The international coffee giant has widely studied and acclaimed supply chain management practices, which, according to some, make Starbucks’ coffee and customer experience superior to those of its competitors.
So, what exactly is Starbucks doing differently than other international coffee retailers? Is its coffee truly better?
The Standards
Starbucks uses a vertically integrated supply chain, which means that the company is involved in every step of its supply chain process, all the way from the coffee bean to the cup of coffee sold to consumers. The use of a vertically integrated system means that Starbucks works directly with its nearly 300,000 worldwide coffee growers. The company believes that interacting directly with farmers ensures that all of its coffee beans will achieve the same quality and flavor standards.
Starbucks also works directly with growers because the company is committed to only selling ethically sourced, Fair Trade coffee. The company even has its own Coffee and Farmer Equity (C.A.F.E) standards and Coffee Sourcing Guidelines (CSG), which require that all suppliers must meet certain ethical, sustainability, and quality standards. Starbucks uses a stringent vetting process to ensure its growers meet and adhere to these guidelines.
Not only do the C.A.F.E. practices and CSG benefit Starbucks, they also provide advantages for suppliers. The guidelines protect workers’ rights and ensure that all growers have safe and humane working conditions. Suppliers also must adhere to minimum-wage requirements and commit to not using child or forced labor.
Lastly, as a part of its C.A.F.E. guidelines, Starbucks commits to providing its suppliers with special training and education programs. Starbucks’ direct interaction with growers, along with their sourcing and social responsibility standards, make suppliers feel like they are integral parts of Starbucks’ corporation. The close relationship and frequent communication between Starbucks and its suppliers, therefore, make the company’s supply chain less susceptible to major disruptions, such as overplanting or worker shortages.
The Process
After the growers pick and package the coffee beans, truckers drive the unroasted beans to ocean liners that ship the beans to six storage sites in the U.S. and Europe. The beans are roasted in these storage facilities and then packaged for shipment to Starbucks’ eight central, and forty-eight regional, distribution centers. By only using a handful of storage facilities, Starbucks can closely manage the sites’ operations and guarantee that all beans are roasted and packaged in the exact same way.
The company’s close control over the roasting process also ensures that Starbucks’ coffee tastes the same in all of its retail locations. Starbucks’ active participation in the supply chain also ensures that the distribution centers receive the products they need so they can fulfill orders and make their roughly 70,000 weekly deliveries on time.
The size and scale of Starbucks’ operations should make its supply chain inherently complex. In 2008, however, Peter Gibbons, the Executive Vice President of Global Supply Chain Operations, overhauled the company’s expensive, ever-growing supply chain into a streamlined, cost-effective process that relies on simple operational structures and metrics.
First, he grouped all supply chain jobs into four categories: plan, source, make, and deliver. Next, he developed a highly centralized logistics system that allows the company to better manage and coordinate its global network. Lastly, he implemented a binary, 0 or 1 “scorecard system” to assess all supply chain activities on four metrics: safety in operations; service measured by on-time delivery and order-fill rates; total supply chain costs; and enterprise savings.
Along with the simple tools and processes that Gibbons created, Starbucks also relies heavily on digital technology to manage its supply chain. The company uses an automated information system that allows it to monitor demand, inventory, capacity, and scheduling in real time. Therefore, Starbucks can quickly adjust its plans and operations as needed. Starbucks’ simple structure and management tools, as well as its use of digital technology, allow the company to achieve a high level of efficiency and agility, both of which are key to organizational success.
The Market
Starbucks’ biggest competitor in the international coffee market is Dunkin’ Donuts. In contrast to Starbucks, which owns its entire supply chain, Dunkin’ Donuts outsources its production processes. Dunkin’ Donuts relies on a third-party intermediary, National DCP, to handle the company’s supply chain operations.
Dunkin’ Donuts also franchises its manufacturing locations, as well as nearly all of its retail spaces. Conversely, Starbucks franchises less than 50% of its retail locations, and, as of March 2016, was no longer accepting applications for new U.S. franchises. Starbucks also uses few to no intermediaries to carry out its supply chain operations.
Unlike Starbucks — which is committed to using 100% sustainably grown, Fair Trade-certified coffee beans — Dunkin’ Donuts promises to produce its coffee as “sustainably as possible.” The company works with Fair Trade USA and the Rainforest Alliance to implement sustainable sourcing practices, as well as training programs for farmers. However, Dunkin’ Donuts only offers two permanent menu items that are Fair Trade-certified: 30% Rainforest Alliance Certified™ Dark Roast Blend and 100% Fair Trade Certified™ espresso.
While Starbucks’ critics may try to argue that the company’s supply chain model and social responsibility efforts are not true differentiators, the statistics tell a different story.
Starbucks was founded roughly twenty years after Dunkin’ Donuts, but the company is already much larger than its rival. In 2023, Starbucks generated $32.2 billion dollars in revenue, while Dunkin’ earned only $1.4 billion. Starbucks also has a larger global presence, with nearly 37,000 retail stores in 80 markets worldwide, compared to Dunkin’s 13,500 locations in 40 countries.
Starbucks also primarily markets to higher-income customers looking for a premium coffee experience, while Dunkin’ Donuts has traditionally retailed to more blue-collar consumers who want coffee on the go. Therefore, Starbucks’ clientele is willing to pay more for coffee that they perceive to be made from higher-quality, socially responsible sources. It used to be that Starbucks’ customers would also pay more for coffee in order to enjoy the amenities offered in the company’s coffeehouses, but even with a consumer shift towards drive-thru and mobile pick-up preferences, Starbucks’ customers seem willing to pay more for convenience. Because Starbucks’ patrons generally have higher disposable incomes than those of Dunkin’ Donuts’ customers, they are less likely to adjust their consumption patterns during economic downturns. Thus, Starbucks is less susceptible than Dunkin’ Donuts to major fluctuations in revenues that could result from negative macroeconomic swings.
The Future
While Dunkin’ Donuts loyalists, particularly those in New England, may never accept the merits of Starbucks coffee, majority opinion argues that Starbucks offers higher-quality beverages and better customer experiences. Statistics show that Starbucks is outperforming its rival, which is evidence of the success of a simple and efficient global supply chain. In fact, Starbucks, which is already larger than Dunkin’ Donuts both domestically and abroad, plans to open more new retail spaces than its competitor over the next five years.
Therefore, one question remains for coffee drinkers and market analysts: Does America actually run on Dunkin’? Or is Starbucks’ coffee really the fuel running our caffeine-crazed country (and world)?
We love writing about all things related to the supply chain, including Starbucks’ supply chain. Need quality content written for your supply chain business? We’re a content agency focused exclusively on working with companies like yours. Let’s chat.
This article is part of a series of articles written by MBA students and graduates from the University of New Hampshire Peter T. Paul College of Business and Economics.
Related posts:
by Fronetics | May 1, 2017 | Blog, Leadership, Strategy
Companies usually try to understand failure, but what could they learn from analyzing their successes, too?
“Success is going from one failure to another without loss of enthusiasm.” Winston Churchill
Failure is said to be inevitable, and we all know it to be true. Any new venture is built on the hope of success. But accepting and managing failure is key to actually obtaining success.
Companies have a responsibility to ask the tough questions when things go awry. We have all been in these meetings: we diagnose failures, and we dissect the process, tools and staff involved to get to the root of the problem. Unfortunately, most companies only step back and really dive into what happened when something bad happens.
But what if companies took the same approach when something went right?
Focusing on the lessons in success
Companies are all a work in process. We learn as we go, and that learning should include understanding our successes. Shifting the focus from ‘what went wrong’ to ‘what went right’ creates a foundation for being able to recreate success in your organization.
Identifying and analyzing the components of a successful process can be the first step in moving into this new mindset. Paul Michelman, editor in chief of the MIT Sloan Management Review, experimented with dissecting his the publication’s successes and quickly discovered that their best processes start with transparency. Michelman wrote:
We plan a pipeline of content that is stored in a document accessible by the key participants. We track each content item’s progress on a shared project management platform. The few times we encounter bumps, a lack of information sharing is almost always at fault.
Though Michelman admits his research is unscientific, the key factors he has identified in their success stories has helped his business focus on what’s working, instead of waiting to dissect failure.
Technology can help
In today’s world, there is no end to the amount of data you can collect on your business. Your company’s digital presence is an easy place to start.
Tools like Google Analytics can give you advanced insight into how prospects are interacting with your company online. You can analyze how people are finding your business, and how they’re moving through your website all the way to making purchases. In other words, you can begin to analyze all of the little successes that make your business turn. How can you replicate that success on new projects and processes?
When things are going well, most companies don’t see the need to reflect on what happened, what went right. But don’t let this opportunity slip by. You should examine failures, but you should also look closely at successes. Take the time to brainstorm with your team on what you’re doing well and how you can keep up that success while you plan for future growth. —
Related posts:
by Fronetics | Mar 15, 2017 | Blog, Content Marketing, Logistics, Marketing, Strategy, Supply Chain
A supply chain company published one more blog post per week and gained a new customer in one month.
Companies in the logistics and supply chain industries have been hesitant to adopt digital and content marketing because they are unsure about the benefits. We hear it all the time: Who is going to read a blog about my business? How is that going to get me more customers?
Something else we see all the time? How content marketing works for supply chain companies.
You see, the B2B buying process has changed. The vast majority of buyers now go online to research products and services they want to purchase. The proof is in the numbers:
- 94% of buyers reported using online research at some point in the purchasing process.
- 62% of B2B buyers say that a web search was one of the first three resources they use to learn about a solution.
- 95% of B2B buyers are willing to consider vendor-related content as trustworthy.
- 67% more leads were generated by companies with an active blog last year.
- 47% of B2B buyers consume 3-5 pieces of content prior to engaging with a salesperson.
- 51% of B2B buyers rely more on content to research and make B2B purchasing decisions than they did a year ago.
I could go on and on.
Blogging frequency matters
Here’s the rub: Blogging every once and awhile isn’t going to get you results. You need to publish quality content on a consistent basis to attract prospects to your site.
The reality is that the more often you blog, the more traffic and leads you’ll get. Search engines consider posting frequency in their rankings. What’s more, every time you post, you create a new opportunity to be found, to be shared, and to be linked to by other sites.
That being said, you don’t need to post five times a week to be successful. In fact, small steps can go a long way.
Try one more post per week
We often encourage our clients to increase their blogging cadence by just one more post per week. Though some are skeptical of the impact this will have on their traffic and lead-generation efforts, they inevitably find that such a small step can make a big difference.
Take one client of ours, for example.
We suggested moving from publishing one post to two posts per week. The client was unsure this would have any impact, especially for a company in the supply chain industry. But the immediate results spoke for themselves.
After just one month, the client saw the following successes:
- Web traffic increased by 23%.
- Social reach increased by 252%.
- Sales leads doubled. 90% of those leads were sourced from organic search.
- A lead converted to a customer.
All of these results were directly related to the increased blog frequency.
Test it out
The trouble in publishing more posts is balancing resources so that you’re publishing frequently but maintaining value and quality within your content. We’re big advocates of testing to find your personal sweet spot for the amount of posts your organization is able to publish to maximize traffic and leads.
Try publishing one more post per week for one month. Track your KPIs, calculate ROI, and assess whether increasing the blogging frequency is right for your business. You may be surprised at the results.
Related posts:
by Fronetics | Jan 19, 2017 | Blog, Content Marketing, Data/Analytics, Marketing, Social Media, Strategy
The chances are that your company is not tweeting as often as it should.
Each second around 6,000 tweets are tweeted. Each minute over 350,000 tweets are tweeted. The median lifespan of each of these tweets is just 18 minutes. After 18 minutes of being live, the chance of someone seeing your tweet is very low. The chance of someone interacting with that tweet — even lower.
Given the large volume of tweets and the short lifespan of each tweet, how often should you tweet?
To get the most value out of each tweet, tweet around five times each day. To get the most value out of your company’s Twitter presence as a whole, tweet up to 30 times per day.
At Fronetics, we recommend focusing on getting the most value out of your company’s twitter presence as opposed to getting the most value out of each tweet.
When developing your Twitter strategy, here are a few things to keep in mind:
Timing is everything.
Identify the time of day most of your followers are active and what time of day your tweets receive the highest level of engagement. Followerwonk and Tweriod are two tools you can use to conduct this analysis. Rival IQ takes the analysis one step further and shows you when your competitors are tweeting and when they are realizing their highest level of engagement.
It is important to conduct this analysis on a regular basis and to adjust your strategy accordingly.
Be relevant. Be strategic.
Every single tweet you send should be relevant and should fit within your strategic goals and objectives.
Don’t be annoying.
Tweeting when your followers are active and when you have the highest levels of engagement is important, but don’t go overboard. For example, if you learn that 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. are the best times of day for your company to tweet, do not schedule all 30 of your tweets to go live at those times.
Be creative.
Don’t tweet the same tweet over and over and over again. It’s ok to share the same article a few times, but change up the image and/or the tweet to make it fresh.
Be visual.
Tweets with images get more engagement than tweets without images. Analysis by Buffer found that tweets with images receive:
- 150% more retweets
- 89% more favorites
- 18% more clicks
Be realistic.
Determine what you can realistically do on a consistent basis. If you can only commit to tweeting 5 times per day, stick with that. It is better to have strategy that you can execute than to have a strategy that cannot realistically be executed.
Finally, remember you don’t need to go it alone. Tools such as Buffer, HootSuite, Sprout Social, and HubSpot allow you to schedule tweets. Scheduling tweets makes it easier to tweet more often so that you can realize the value of a Twitter strategy.
Related posts:
by Fronetics | Sep 19, 2016 | Blog, Content Marketing, Marketing, Social Media
Twitter is changing its rules on the 140-character limit for your tweets.
In May, Twitter announced that it planned to make changes to the types of content that count toward the platform’s 140-character limit. The social network provided no firm timeline as to when the changes would take place, but The Verge reports that September 19th is the big day.
What are the changes? And what do they mean to you?
Media attachments including photos, GIFs, videos, polls, and Quote Tweets will no longer count toward your 140-character limit. Also no longer counting toward the character limit: @names in replies.
Other changes:
- The ability to retweet and quote yourself so that you can share new insight on one of your Tweets, or share it again if you feel like it went unnoticed.
- Tweets that begin with a username will reach all your followers. This means that you will no longer need to use the awkward ”.@” convention.
Together these changes mean that you will have more flexibility in communicating via Twitter.
It isn’t clear if all the announced changes will occur simultaneously, or if they will be rolled out separately.
Related posts:
